This story has been updated
A Russian missile landed in the territory of Poland, a NATO member, on Tuesday, killing two people, the Polish government confirmed in a statement on Wednesday.
The “Russia-made” missile landed in the Polish village of Przewodów near the border of Ukraine, the government said, adding that the country has summoned the Russian ambassador over the matter.
Polish government spokesman Piotr Muller told Reuters on is verifying “whether there are grounds to launch procedures under Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty,” which allows NATO members to bring up security concerns for consideration among member states.
Subscribe to Task & Purpose Today. Get the latest military news, entertainment, and gear in your inbox daily.
Russia’s defense ministry released a statement through state media on Tuesday denying that it had attacked Poland.
“The statements of the Polish media and officials about the fall of ‘Russian’ missiles in the Przedwoduv region are a deliberate provocation, the Russian Armed Forces did not strike any targets near the Ukrainian-Polish border, the Russian Defense Ministry said,” according to TASS.
Images circulating on social media purportedly show the aftermath of the missile strike:
The missile strike comes on the same day that Russia launched a massive barrage of missiles into Ukraine targeting residential buildings and energy infrastructure in the capital of Kyiv and other cities.
Previous missile attacks had already destroyed an estimated 40% of Ukraine’s energy existing infrastructure, the AP reports.
“We’re working, will restore everything,” Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky said on Tuesday in response to the missile barrage. “We will survive everything.”
As a NATO member, Poland is a party to the principle of collective defense laid out in Article 5 of the alliance’s charter, which states that an armed attack on one member “is considered an attack against all allies.”
Article 5 has only ever been invoked once since NATO’s inception, following the September 11th, 2001 terror attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, DC.
The language in Article 5 is flexible, however, as it allows each NATO member state to decide on what possible action may be taken should one of the organization’s members be attacked. That could come in the form of direct military intervention or just sending equipment to aid other NATO members should the article be invoked. The U.S. would, of course, have to obtain congressional authorization for the use of force if a potential conflict were to trigger Article 5.
“Dear friends, there is no such thing as ‘triggering’ Article 5,” retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, former commander of U.S. Army Europe, tweeted on Tuesday. “It’s not automatic. There is no laser beam that opens a door like at a hotel or store if you walk thru it. Art 5 is a political decision. In this case, Art 4 Consultations seem appropriate, until we have more facts.”
This is a developing story and will be updated with more information as it becomes available.
The latest on Task & Purpose
Want to write for Task & Purpose? Click here. Or check out the latest stories on our homepage.